EP 68: The Internet Is Dead, Stop Trusting the Feed

The Internet Is Dead, Stop Trusting the Feed | AI for Interior Designers™
AI for Interior Designers™ Podcast

The Internet Is Dead. Stop Trusting the Feed.

Why bots, algorithms, and misinformation are rewriting how we connect online — and what designers must do next.

This blog was written using AI as a recap from the recording, then edited by the author for accuracy and details.
Key Takeaways
  • The Dead Internet Theory is not a fringe conspiracy — it is a lived experience. Bots, AI-generated content, and manipulative algorithms have fundamentally changed what the feed actually is.
  • Social media platforms were never built for your benefit. They are built to keep you engaged, sell you things, and shape what you believe. Knowing that changes how you use them.
  • In-person and real human connection has never mattered more. As the feed gets emptier, relationships built offline become the actual engine of trust and business growth.
  • AI can give you time back — but only if you use it intentionally. The goal is less busywork, more real life. Not more content for a feed that is already full of noise.
  • Private communities built around genuine interest and real identity are what is coming next. Not social media. Not another platform owned by a billionaire with an agenda.

The Short Answer

The internet is not literally gone. But the version of it that felt like real human connection — where you posted something and actual people responded, where you found real information from real sources, where the feed reflected what you actually cared about — that version is largely dead. What replaced it is a system designed to divide, distract, and monetize your attention. This episode is about naming that honestly, and figuring out what designers do with that knowledge.

What Dead Internet Theory Actually Means

Dead Internet Theory is the idea that a significant portion of internet activity — comments, engagement, content, even entire accounts — is now generated by bots rather than real people. Reports suggest that in some platform comment sections, close to half of the activity is non-human. Bots arguing with bots. Bots generating outrage to pull humans in. Bots keeping the engagement metrics up so the platform can show advertisers that people are still there.

Jenna is not presenting this as a conspiracy theory. She is presenting it as something she has watched unfold over nearly a decade of building online communities. She watched Facebook groups fill with AI-generated content and fabricated historical stories with AI images attached. She watched LinkedIn become a stream of polished, soulless AI posts from people who want to be seen as thought leaders without having an actual thought. She watched engagement drop while ad costs went up.

"Half of the comment sections are bots. Whether they're AI or some other format of bot — they're there for engagement. Some are there just to tear people apart. The algorithms show you what they want you to see."

— Jenna Gaidusek

Once you see it, you cannot unsee it. And once you know it, you can stop taking the feed personally and start treating it for what it is: a manipulated environment that is not an accurate reflection of reality, your audience, or the world.

Platforms Were Not Built for You

This is the part that Jenna is most direct about. Social media platforms were not created so that you could connect with people who share your interests, market your design services, or build a community. They were created to capture attention and sell advertising. Everything else — the groups, the stories, the comment sections, the follow buttons — is infrastructure for that core business model.

The experience of being on these platforms has become ads, anger, and division because that combination keeps people scrolling longer than contentment does. That is not a bug. It is the intended outcome.

When you know that the platform has an agenda that is not yours, you can use it accordingly — showing up when it serves a real purpose, without expecting it to give back what it was never designed to provide.

Jenna is still on Instagram because she wants a record of these conversations in public. She is not there because she believes the algorithm is working in her favor, because she is chasing follower counts, or because she thinks the engagement she gets is representative of her actual audience. She is there on her own terms, with low expectations of the platform and high expectations of herself.

Misinformation, Research, and Your Own Discernment

The erosion of trust online is not just about bots. It is about the ease with which misinformation spreads, gets amplified by algorithms, and gets picked up as fact by people who have not traced it back to a source. Anyone can publish a website. Anyone can create a study. Anyone can put up a social account that looks authoritative.

Jenna's approach: she does not trust information unless it comes from a person speaking directly from their own experience, or unless she can trace it back through multiple legitimate sources. She goes down the rabbit hole. She asks who published it, what their credentials are, and whether the source actually exists. She treats everything she reads online as potentially false until she has a reason to believe otherwise.

For designers, this matters in two directions. First, the information you are consuming and repeating about your industry — AI tools, trend forecasts, business advice — deserves the same skepticism you would apply to anything else online. Second, your own presence needs to be clearly, unmistakably human. Real opinions. Real experience. Real voice. That is the only thing that holds up in an environment where everything else is suspect.

The internet doesn't know what's next. It is a predictive tool — it looks for patterns in what already exists. If you want to lead your industry rather than follow it, some of what makes you different should stay off the feed entirely.

Where Real Connection Actually Happens Now

Jenna has spent the past few years investing more in in-person relationships than in her social media presence — and she is clear that the return on that investment is not comparable. The people who support your work most consistently, who refer clients, who want to collaborate, who show up when you need them, are almost never strangers you met through an algorithm. They are people you met in a room.

This is not nostalgia. It is practical. If the feed is increasingly unreliable as a channel for real connection and real business, then the time and energy you redirect toward in-person visibility, real conversations, and genuine relationships is not a step backward. It is a strategic reallocation.

Show up in rooms. Industry events, local design centers, trade shows, speaking opportunities — these are where relationships with real staying power get built.
Find the niche, human accounts. The smaller, unpolished, first-person accounts telling true stories are where real signal still exists online. Stop optimizing for the biggest reach and start optimizing for the realest connection.
Build or seek out private communities. Not another social platform. Smaller, self-moderated, interest-specific spaces where the people are real, the conversation is genuine, and no algorithm decides what you see.
Use voice instead of text where you can. A voice clip sent directly to a person is more human than a typed reply. It is harder to fake and harder to misread. It also takes less time than crafting a careful email.

AI as a Tool for Freedom, Not More Content

Jenna makes a point worth sitting with: AI could actually be the solution to reclaiming time from the internet — but only if you use it to reduce busywork rather than to generate more output for a feed that is already oversaturated.

The version of AI use that pulls you deeper into the scroll — using it to produce more posts, more content, more presence across more platforms — is the wrong direction. The version that gives you back an hour a day by handling email drafts, summarizing research, cleaning up transcripts, and organizing your thinking — that is the version that actually serves you.

"I teach AI. But I do not replace myself with AI. Any interaction with me — I want it to be as human as possible."

— Jenna Gaidusek

The goal Jenna keeps coming back to is simple: use AI for the things that pull you away from what only you can do, so that you have more capacity for the human parts of your work and your life. Less time on inbox management. More time in client conversations. Less time reformatting content. More time rearranging furniture because it brings you joy. That is the trade worth making.

A Reset for the Week

This episode is not a call to delete your accounts or abandon your online presence. It is a call to be honest about what you are getting from the time you spend there — and to make different choices if the answer is "not much."

Notice how you feel after 20 minutes on any social platform. Energized or emptied? That answer tells you something.
Set one boundary this week. No phone after a certain hour. One day with no social media. Whatever is one step toward protecting the time that is actually yours.
Identify one in-person thing you have been putting off. A local industry event, a coffee with someone you have only talked to online, a visit to a showroom. Do that thing.
Find one thing AI can take off your plate this week — not to produce more content, but to give you back an hour you can spend differently.
Frequently Asked Questions
Dead Internet Theory is the idea that a substantial and growing portion of internet activity — content, comments, engagement, and even accounts — is now generated by bots and AI rather than real people. Reports suggest that in some social media comment sections, close to half of the activity is non-human. The practical result is a feed that looks active but feels hollow, because much of what you are seeing was never created by a person with genuine intent.
Not necessarily — but the relationship with it needs to change. Showing up on social media because you feel you have to, chasing an algorithm that is not working in your favor, and measuring your worth by engagement metrics on a platform full of bots is not a sustainable marketing strategy. Showing up intentionally, with clear expectations, as one channel among many — including in-person relationships and private communities — is a much healthier and often more effective approach.
The channels that are working best right now for designers are the ones that require real human presence: speaking at industry events, showing up at trade shows and design centers, building genuine relationships with other professionals, appearing on podcasts, contributing to niche publications, and nurturing an email list of people who actually asked to hear from you. Paid social ads are expensive and increasingly unreliable. Real relationships compound over time in ways that algorithmic reach does not.
The key is using AI to reduce the administrative and repetitive work that pulls you to your desk — drafting emails, organizing research, summarizing notes, reformatting documents — rather than using it to generate more content for more platforms. If AI gives you back an hour a day that you redirect toward in-person connection, creative work, or time away from a screen, that is the right use of it. If it is making you produce more to feed a feed that was already overwhelming, that is worth reconsidering.
Private online communities are smaller, self-moderated spaces built around specific shared interests — not owned by a major platform, not ad-supported, and not algorithmically curated. Think less "social media" and more "digital clubhouse." Jenna has been building one since mid-2024, focused on genuine human connection without the noise, the ads, or the negativity that define mainstream platforms. Her prediction: as trust in public social media continues to erode, these kinds of spaces will become where real professional relationships are built and maintained.
Jenna's framework: trust people speaking from direct personal experience first. For everything else — trend reports, business advice, AI tool recommendations, industry statistics — trace it back. Who published it? What are their credentials? Can you find the primary source? The same skepticism you would apply to a stranger handing you a business card should apply to anything you read on a platform owned by someone with an agenda that is not yours. When in doubt, go look it up yourself rather than taking the feed's word for it.
Use AI on Your Own Terms
Learn AI Without Losing Your Voice
If this episode resonated, the AI for Interior Designers™ classes and Certificate Program are built around exactly this: using AI intentionally, ethically, and in a way that gives you time back instead of pulling you deeper into the noise.
 
Disclaimer: This blog was written using AI as a recap from the recording then edited by the author for accuracy and details.

 
 

Previous
Previous

EP 69: Is Interior Design Rendering Dead? How AI Tools Are Changing Client Visuals

Next
Next

EP 67: Touch Grass, Save Your Sanity